Why Financial Benchmarking for Restaurants Isn’t What You Think

Nick Stauff • October 27, 2025

In the restaurant industry, the pressure is relentless. Between thin margins and rising expectations, the cost of a financial misstep is higher than ever. 


Operators know they need to track performance, but too often, benchmarking is mistaken for a simple game of comparison, measuring yourself against other brands.


The reality is, true benchmarking in restaurants has little to do with comparison and everything to do with achieving clarity.


Top-performing restaurant groups treat benchmarking not as a vanity exercise but as a leadership tool. It’s how they align their teams, forecast with discipline, and measure progress in a way that drives profitability week after week. 


They don’t just look at numbers. They use them to spark operational change, reset habits, and earn stakeholder confidence.


This post covers the financial and operational benchmarks worth tracking and shows how steady systems and routines turn numbers into better decisions, stronger accountability, and real momentum.




1. Cash Flow 


Every restaurant group needs one thing before setting benchmarks or targets: a clear view of cash.


That means knowing exactly what’s coming in, what’s going out, and what’s ahead, across all accounts each week. Without this visibility, even the best budgeting efforts fall apart. 


Operators end up reacting to fire drills, making short-term decisions, and losing trust with partners and stakeholders.


The best way to build that clarity is with a rolling cash flow model: five weeks of actuals paired with a 13-week forecast. 


This setup gives teams a live view of how money moves through the business and where pressure points or breathing room appear.


In many turnarounds, this is the first step. Before tackling labor costs or food margins, focus on stabilizing cash flow and building a habit of reviewing it. Once that foundation is set, real benchmarking can begin.


With cash steady, Global Shared Services (GSS), a finance and accounting partner built for multi-unit restaurants, guides teams through a clear sequence: labor discipline first, then COGS control, and finally EBITDA expansion.



2. Financial Benchmarks





When profits fall or cash runs thin, the instinct is often to push for more sales. But sustainable improvement rarely comes from revenue alone. 


Real progress starts with seeing how efficiently each dollar is used and whether the operation is performing to its potential.


Through its CFO support services, GSS helps owners, operators, and finance leaders set benchmark targets based on real data from its network of multi-unit restaurant groups, ensuring performance goals are practical and actionable.


  • Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)

Food and beverage costs are among the most controllable and revealing parts of restaurant finance. In high-performing concepts, COGS typically lands in the low 20% range of total sales. When it rises above that, it often points to deeper issues such as inconsistent portioning, waste, or pricing misalignment.


  • Labor Costs

The same logic applies to labor. While staffing needs vary, the best-run restaurant groups keep labor in the low 20% range by pairing guest experience with disciplined scheduling and forecasting. If labor spending feels chaotic or unpredictable, it’s often a sign that financial visibility is lacking.


  • EBITDA Margin

COGS and labor drive the results that show up in EBITDA. For most restaurant groups, a healthy EBITDA range is between 10–20%, with store-level top performers exceeding that. Falling below often signals broader structural issues such as outdated workflows, underperforming teams, or weak alignment between finance and operations.


Benchmarking provides valuable insights beyond mere numbers. These aren't arbitrary targets or imitations of competitors; rather, they reveal successful strategies from comparable restaurants, offering teams a clear vision of optimal performance.

When paired with a solid operational structure, they give teams a clear point of focus week after week.


3. Operational Benchmarks


If financial metrics show what’s happening, operational benchmarks reveal why, and they create the discipline to fix it. The most successful restaurant groups treat these benchmarks as both a management system and a leadership tool, building habits of accountability through two layers of data: internal process metrics and customer-facing performance metrics.


The foundational internal tool is a rolling forecast: five weeks of actuals paired with a 13-week outlook. This model gives operators a real-time view of cash and labor, showing exactly where money is going and how accurately teams are projecting it. The discipline begins here: each location must submit a detailed four-week labor forecast every week.


That requirement changes behavior. It sets a weekly habit of accountability and a simple loop: forecast, review, adjust. Gaps in planning and execution surface quickly. For one GSS client, this weekly rhythm made it immediately clear who was engaged with the numbers. Leaders could spot anomalies, like a sudden spike in host costs, before they became problems. Within a year, the group’s renewed discipline helped lift EBITDA from $7 million to $9 million, a $2 million+ profit increase.


Beyond financial visibility, operational benchmarking connects directly to the guest experience. When staffing and labor forecasts are built on data instead of instinct, service runs smoother, teams feel supported, and customers notice the difference. Overstaffing leads to waste; understaffing causes burnout. Both show up in slower service, lower morale, and eventually lost revenue.


To connect the two, GSS pairs financial forecasting with store-level indicators that explain the “why” behind the numbers:


  • Transaction Data: Number of transactions over time and average price per transaction.
  • Speed of Service: Metrics such as time from order to delivery or table turn times.
  • Store Experience Scores: Guest satisfaction or feedback metrics that reflect consistency and engagement.


These metrics, combined with structured weekly reporting, turn benchmarking into a shared weekly routine. Store-level teams learn to act early, adjust faster, and perform better week after week.



Finally, this discipline builds external trust as well as internal alignment. Clean, consistent reporting demonstrates control and progress to banks and investors, making it easier to rebuild credibility during technical defaults or capital negotiations. For GSS clients, weekly forecasting becomes more than an internal exercise; it shows the business is stable, based on data, and moving forward. 


Benchmarking as a Path to Clarity





Financial benchmarking helps restaurants see what’s working, what’s not, and what needs to change. It serves as a leadership tool, not a scoreboard.


When done well, benchmarking can help restaurant groups to:


  • Track what matters week over week
  • Spot gaps before they grow into problems
  • Create alignment between finance and operations
  • Build credibility with banks and investors
  • Turn reporting into progress, not just another requirement


Ultimately, this approach fosters continuous improvement. The aim is not to achieve an elusive perfect figure, but to establish a system that highlights progress, promotes shared accountability, and ensures decisions are data-driven, rather than based on speculation.


If your business is navigating late closes, pressure from lenders, or an urgent need for better forecasting, consider a 30-Day CFO Services Trial from GSS. With over 20 years of experience, GSS helps operators regain financial control, align their figures, and rebuild stakeholder trust.


Frequently Asked Questions About Restaurant Financial Benchmarking



  • How is GSS’s approach to benchmarking different from just comparing my numbers to industry averages?

    Our approach isn’t about static, one-to-one comparisons. Instead, we use our deep experience with similar concepts to set realistic, achievable performance targets for your operation. It’s less about where you rank and more about creating a clear, week-by-week path to improve your specific labor, COGS, and EBITDA margins.


  • My team is already overwhelmed closing the books. How can we handle weekly forecasting?

    This is exactly where we start. If you’re behind, the first step isn’t benchmarking—it’s gaining control. We quickly implement a straightforward cash flow report (5 weeks actuals, 13-week forecast) to stop the fire drills. We then integrate with your operations to build the forecasting habit, often freeing up your team’s time by bringing structure to the chaos.


  • We’re in a cash crunch and having issues with our bank. Can this really help?

    Yes, directly. The clarity and discipline of our process are designed to rebuild trust with lenders. By producing clean, consistent weekly reports, you can show the bank—not just tell them—that you have a handle on your cash and a credible plan. We’ve helped groups navigate technical defaults by making their progress transparent and undeniable to all stakeholders.


  • What if my managers resist the new accountability?

    It’s a common challenge, which is why we frame it as a leadership tool, not a punishment. We work with you to create a structured, non-confrontational weekly review rhythm. When managers see that accurate forecasting leads to better scheduling, less stress, and recognition for good performance, resistance typically turns into buy-in. Our team acts as an objective third party to facilitate this cultural shift.


  • What kind of results can we realistically expect in the first 30 days?

    The 30-day trial is designed for rapid clarity, not an overnight fix. When working with our financial experts, you can expect a full benchmarking assessment, the implementation of our cash and labor forecasting tools, and the establishment of a weekly review cadence. The goal is to leave the trial with a crystal-clear picture of your financial position, an actionable plan for improvement, and often, immediate wins in cash flow visibility that build momentum for the larger turnaround.


Share this post

Insights

Related Posts

How a 50-Location Restaurant Recovered $2M in Nine Months

By Nick Stauff • October 27, 2025
Discover how Global Shared Services helped a 50-location restaurant chain avoid default, slash audit costs, and drive a $2M EBITDA turnaround in just 9 months.

Think Outsourcing Means Losing Control? Here’s the Real Story

By Nick Stauff • October 13, 2025
Most restaurant owners know what it’s like to manage every detail. You built your team, learned each regulation the hard way, and protected the culture you built. The thought of letting someone else handle your HR, payroll, or accounting sparks real anxiety. What if you lose sight of the details that set your restaurant apart? What if the personal touch gets overlooked? These worries can stall growth early. If you’ve wondered whether outsourcing means losing touch with your operation, you’re not alone. That fear comes up often in conversations with operators. In a recent discussion with Melissa Duque , Associate General Counsel and HR Manager at Accurate Employer Solutions (AES), the struggle became clear. Melissa’s candid perspective argues that trying to keep every task in-house can be the bigger risk. The Outsourcing Control Myth Restaurant operators often feel that keeping payroll, HR, and finance in-house means keeping control. You know your people, your brand, and your standards. Letting outsiders in can cause worry about culture, compliance, and potential mistakes. Many owners think they’re the only ones who can protect quality and keep their business safe. This belief lingers because the restaurant industry depends on slim margins and close relationships. Owners worry about losing touch or missing details. Still, doing everything yourself can lead to burnout, slower performance, and missed opportunities. This belief keeps many in routines that sap time and block growth. What Really Happens When You Outsource HR and Finance Restaurant owners face tough choices about where to spend their time. Outsourcing HR and finance brings in specialized experts who understand compliance, payroll, and benefits in detail. You spend less time on paperwork and more time leading your team. Operators see fewer errors, more reliable payroll, and current compliance, even across multiple locations. As Melissa puts it, “We have specialized folks in different areas of HR, whether that be payroll, benefits, administration, compliance.” The change provides clear reporting and data you can act on. Outsourcing gives you tools and freedom to focus on operations, growth, and the culture that makes your restaurant distinct.

Restaurant Budget Accountability: How to Set Realistic Goals and Incentives

By William Fleming • October 13, 2025
Running a restaurant is tough. Rising labor costs, unpredictable sales, and slim margins make financial discipline essential. Yet many operators fall into a common trap: setting ambitious stretch goals instead of building realistic budgets their teams can actually follow. Restaurant budget accountability addresses this problem directly. The goal isn’t simply to slash costs. It’s about giving every manager and team member clear targets, ownership of results, and tools to make better financial decisions every day. Why Stretch Targets Fail Restaurants Stretch targets may sound inspiring, but realistic budgets are what keep operations on track. When restaurant leaders confuse the two, accountability breaks down. Imagine telling managers to hit a 25% labor cost in a market where wages push the realistic number closer to 30%. Everyone knows the goal is impossible. Morale sinks, bonuses go unpaid, and managers stop paying close attention to schedules and waste. Unrealistic goals create disengagement, while realistic, data-backed budgets give teams confidence. When incentives align with achievable targets, such as reducing prime cost by one point compared to last quarter, managers are motivated to act. To avoid this disconnect, operators can use tools like restaurant forecasting , which applies real sales data to set benchmarks that teams can actually reach. What Restaurant Budget Accountability Really Means Restaurant budget accountability means: Every budget target has a clear owner. Performance is tracked regularly against actual results. Variances are addressed right away, not weeks later. A kitchen manager might own food costs, while the GM owns labor scheduling. When each leader knows what they control, accountability becomes a shared effort instead of a directive from above. Building accountability also depends on accurate restaurant accounting practices . With clear reporting, managers can see where labor cost percentage or food cost percentage drifts from the plan and take corrective action quickly. Why Budgets Break Down Even well-meaning plans fall apart without accountability. The most common pitfalls usually fall into three areas. Unrealistic forecasting. Building in stretch assumptions like 20% sales growth or sudden cost cuts makes buy-in impossible. Misaligned incentives. When bonus plans are tied to unattainable labor or food cost percentages, trust erodes quickly. High turnover and inconsistent processes. Without standard training and review cycles, costs swing and accountability disappears. Many of these issues mirror the top restaurant accounting mistakes , like relying on poor data or failing to update budgets when conditions change. When accountability fades, goals are missed, resources are wasted, and cash flow problems pile up. 

Back Office, Front Impact

By Nick Stauff • October 2, 2025
In this episode of The Financial Advantage with GSS, host Nick Stauff sits down with Melissa Duque, Associate General Counsel and HR Manager at Accurate Employer Solutions.

Position your business for success

See how we can help.

Schedule a call